What I'm interested in is D'Souza's insouciance in bandying Pascal's Wager about without really understanding the math involved in game-theoretic decision making (if he does understand it, his argument is just totally dishonest), so that he's incapable of making discriminations among different cases which are qualitatively alike, but which, on quantitative grounds, lead to divergent conclusions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Thats Pascal for you, always bandying about wit his Wagner hangin out
Post a Comment